So there has been backlash to Will and Kate (especially, because she’s a woman and women always get sh-t on harder than men) leaving poor little George (their PR stunt baby) behind with Carole and a nanny while Will and Kate jet off on a week-long holiday in the Maldives. To me, this is not surprising. Of course they would get backlash for leaving their son behind, that’s half the reason they’re taking him to Oz. They really are idiots, or they thought they wouldn’t get caught going on this trip, for leaving George. Anyway, there hasn’t been as much backlash from the press, because they got to go to a private meeting at KP where they met George so they won’t print anything negative. There has also been some backlash about the cost of their trip—reportedly one villa costs $10,000 for 4 days, and each meal costs $500, and that doesn’t include the plane costs and all the costs for the security team they brought with them.
A “source” close to the Cambs has come out to defend their decision to leave George, and it’s total BS. The source says: “Kate and William thought it was a great plan to let their new employee get to know George’s routine and habits while they weren’t there. She will be the woman who will be caring for George while Kate and William are doing their royal duties so she needs to get to know him. They thought it best to be out of the way and leave Carole there to oversee the process. It also meant they could have a bit of time together after what has been a very tiring year for the both of them.”
WTF? The best way to get to know George’s routine is to watch his routine done by the people who know it and do it best. Then have them watch you as you do it. Only then can you take full responsibility for it. But I guess this just tells us that Kate and Will are not a part of George’s normal routine. Who the hell thinks it’s best for a new nanny to get to know the baby and his routine by leaving the nanny alone with the child without its parents? The baby needs someone it knows and trusts when you are introducing a new person into its life. This defense is such crap.
Also, I want to talk about this article, mainly one section of it. So the article is about the online public reaction to Kate leaving George while she vacations, and that’s great that they are acknowledging the public’s annoyance, but then they have two women give a point-counterpoint to the issue. The first one is by Karen Brady (yeah, I don’t know who she is either), and she claims that it is a good thing they left George behind. What this moron doesn’t realize is that her entire argument is negated by the fact that Kate, when she took George to Mustique, already did all the things this woman claims George is being spared from by being left home from Maldives. All the luggage crap, the screaming baby on a long flight, the break in normal routine… all done when Kate took George to Mustique. Also clearly this woman is a sycophantic idiot because she says that Will and Kate’s is a “household where even a blind man can see there is much love.” No. A blind man could not see the love in that household, what we can see is that they are pretty cold with each other and seem to not give a ton of shits about each other or their child. Seriously, this chick is a moron.
PS. This is being billed as George’s new nanny, taking him for a walk in the park sometime last week.